Commercialization of Intellectual Property Rights as Foundation for Innovation

1Kodynetz, АO  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0954-1474
1Maidanyk, LR  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-4513
1Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Law Faculty, Intellectual Property Department
Nauka innov. 2019, 15(4):91-102
https://doi.org/10.15407/scin15.04.091
Section: Legal Protection of Intellectual Property
Language: English
Abstract: 
Introduction. Innovations are considered impossible without intellectual, creative work of authors. Inventors and others are involved into this process. Ukraine has approved striving to become technologically developed and competitive member of international relationships in the view of information era.
Problem Statement. Most of patents issued in Ukraine do not provide profitability for patented technical solutions. Thus, effective commercialization of intellectual property rights is crucial on the way to the developed innovative economics of Ukraine. Commercialization of intellectual property rights is considered as the foundation for innovation process.
Purpose. The purpose is to disclose the concept of commercialization of intellectual property rights.
Materials and Methods. The concept and elements of intellectual property commercialization have been analyzed.
Results. The commercialization of intellectual property rights is characterized by graduality, which is reflected in stages which are realized one after another.
Conclusions. The following stages (elements) of commercialization of intellectual property have been identified: identification of the object of intellectual property and obtaining a security document, unless otherwise provided by law; marketing (product identification, market analysis, sales channels, pricing, audit), which includes, in addition to the above promotion of the product / service using the object of intellectual property; valuation of intellectual property (cost method, market (comparative), income methods of valuation); intellectual property rights insurance; search for users and conclusion of agreements with them on exploitation of intellectual property rights. The research has focused on some types of agreements connected directly or indirectly with intellectual property: license, license agreement, assignment agreement, franchise agreement, non-disclosure (confidentiality) agreement, and collaboration agreement.
Keywords: commercialization of intellectual property rights, innovations
References: 
1. Ukraine in the Global. Innovation Dimension Report. 2007–2017. 
URL: http://k750.media/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/UReport_final-version_1.pdf 
​(Last accessed: 31.05.2018).
2. Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$) 2018. 
URL:  https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.GSR.ROYL.CD (Last accessed: 05.06.2018).
3. Vasil'yeva, E. (2014). Sdelki, obespechivayushchiye kommertsializatsiyu prav na rezul'taty intellektual'noy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i v Ukraine (sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz). Kyiv: Yuridicheskaya praktika.
4. U.S. Patent Law, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. (consolidated as of May 2015). 
URL: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=15705 (Last accessed: 27.08.2018).
5. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 
URL:  http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=18023  (Last accessed: 27.08.2018).
6. Richnyy zvit za 2016 r. Cayt Ukrpatentu. 
URL: http://www.uipv.org/i_upload/file/AnnualReport/zvit_ukr-2016.pdf  
(Last accessed: 27.08.2018).
7. Pokaznyky nadkhodzhennya ta roz·hlyadu zayavok ta reyestratsiyi okhoronnykh dokumentiv za I kvartal 2018 roku. Sayt Ukrpatentu. 
URL: http://www.uipv.org/ua/1kv-2018 (Last accessed: 27.08.2018).
8. Koval, I. F. (2018). Komertsializatsiya prav intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
9. WIPO 2018. 
URL: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/mdocs/en/cdip_16/cdip_16_inf_4.pdf 
(Last accessed: 05.06.2018).
10. Maidanyk, L. R. (2014). Ponyattya ta mekhanizm komertsializatsiyi intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti v pravi Ukrayiny. Yurydychna Ukrayina, 7, 39–40 [in Ukrainian].
11. Hudzovatyy, O., Voronovsʹka, R. (2013). Pidkhodi ta metody ots’ynky ob'yektiv intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti. Ekonomichnyy analiz, 12, Ch. 3, 95–99 [in Ukrainian].
12. Natsionalʹnyy standart № 4 «Otsinka maynovoho prav intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti» 
URL: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1185-2007-%D0%BF (Last accessed: 05.06.2018).
13. Final Report from the expert group on IP valuation. EU Commission web-site. 
URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/Expert_Group_Report_o...
(Last accessed: 05.06.2018).
14. IP and Finance: Accounting and Valuation of IP Assets and IP Based Financing By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalor 
URL:  http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/sme/en/wipo_smes_bwn_13/wipo_smes_bwn_13...
(Last accessed: 01.06.2018).
15. Hagelin, T. (2002). A new method to value intellectual property. American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, 30, 353 [in English].
16. Elena Pérez Carrillo, Frank Cuypers. (2013). Viability of Patent Insurance in Spain. Madrid.
17. Michael Meurer. (2018). Allocating Patent Litigation Risk Across the Supply Chain. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 18-02 [in English].
18. Kodynetsʹ, A. O. (2015). Dohovirni vidnosyny u sferi peredannya maynovykh prav intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti. Teoriya i praktyka intelektualʹnoyi vlasnosti, 2, 5–13 [in Ukrainian].
19. Mossoff, Adam. (2018). The Telegraph. A History of Intellectual Property in 50 Objects. Cambridge University Press. George Mason Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 18-11. (Last accessed: 01.06.2018).
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3157857