Nauka innov. 2005, 1(4):42-49
https://doi.org/10.15407/scin1.04.042

Norbert Buzas
Innovation Management University of Szeged

 

The Need for Capacity Building at Universities in CEE Countries for Successful Technology Transfer

Section: Emerging Technologies, Innovation Management and Technology Transfer in Central and East Europe
Language: English
Abstract: Owing to the rapid multiplication of related information, the acceleration in its dissemination and the constant reduction in the costs of access to it, technology transfer processes have undergone significant transformation in recent years. Adaptation to the changing circumstances causes difficulties for several institutions even in countries with more developed economies and considerable traditions in innovation management. The transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe, however, have to face the challenges of combating general economic fallback and establishing institutions that can enter the competition with the operating institutional system of modern economies. These latter ones also include effective technology transfer institutions. With the help of a case study, the present paper introduces how the main sources of technologies can be utilized and what basic measures universities should take in order to build up a successful technology transfer system.
Key words: technology transfer processes, innovation management.

Full text (PDF)

References:
1. Amesse, F., Cohendet, P. (2001): Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy. Research Policy 30:1459–1478.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00162-7
2. Buzas, N. (2003): Entrepreneurial attitudes influencing the formation of spin-off companies in a transition economy. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of IGU Commission on Dynamics of Economic Spaces, Vancouver, Canada.
3. Buzas, N., Szanyi, M. (2004): Challenges of Hungarian Science Policy: the Evolution of a Knowledge-Based Economy and Society. Institute for World Economics, HAS, Working Papers N 143, May 2004: 1–3.
4. Buzas, N. (2005): From Technology Transfer to Knowledge Transfer: An Institutional Transition. In: C. G. Alvstam – E. Schamp: Linking Industries Across the World, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, 2005: 109–123.
5. COM (2003) 27: Green Paper: Entrepreneurship in Europe. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
6. Goldfarb, B., Henrekson, M. (2003): Bottomup versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy 32: 639–658.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00034-3
7. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H. (1996): Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Science and Public Policy 23: 279–286.
8. Meske, W. (2000): Changes in the innovation system in economies in transition: basic patterns, sectorial and national particularities. www.wzb.de/wt/meske/spp2000a.doc.
9. Nelsen, L. L. (2004): A US perspective on technology transfer: the changing role of the university. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 5: 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1337
10. Oakey, R. (1995): High-technology New Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth. Paul Chapman, London.
11. Schmoch, U. (1999): Interaction of Universities and Industrial Enterprises in Germany and the United States – a Comparison. Industry and Innovation 6: 51–68.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13662719900000004