Increasing the Bio Gas Release During the Cattle Manure Fermentation by Means the Rational Addition of Substandard Flour as a Cosubstrate

TitleIncreasing the Bio Gas Release During the Cattle Manure Fermentation by Means the Rational Addition of Substandard Flour as a Cosubstrate
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsPolishchuk, VM, Shvorov, SA, Tarasenko, SYe., Antypov, IO
Short TitleNauka innov.
SectionScientific Basis of Innovation Activity
Introduction. The processing of livestock waste and agricultural production enables not only improving environmental safety, but also obtaining energy resources.
Problem Statement. Cow manure is used to produce biogas, but its yield is relatively low. One way to increase biogas yield is the joint fermentation of cow manure with substandard flour, which cannot be used as human food and as feed for farm animals. However, the flour content in the substrate, at which the biogas yield is maximum and there is no inhibition of the methane fermentation process, is not a solved issue.
Purpose. Increase biogas yield by adding substandard flour to a cow manure-based substrate.
Materials and Methods. Research of biogas yield during methane fermentation of substrate based on cow manure with the addition of substandard flour was carried out on a biogas plant consisting of a methane tank with a working volume of 30 l and wet gasholder at periodic substrate loading and fermentation temperature 35°C. The portion of the substrate included 1.7 kg of manure, 2.5 kg of water and 50, 100, 250 or 500g of flour. The composition of flour in the substrate was 1.2%, 2.3%, 5.6% and 10.6%. The dichotomy method was used to determine the optimal flour content in the substrate, provided the maximum biogas yield.
Results. The maximum biomethane release is 14.3 l/kg dry organic matter (DOM), at 1.2% of the flour content in the substrate; 20.9 l/kg DOM, at 2.3%; 19.2 l/kg DOM, at 5.6%. At a content of 10.6% flour in the substrate, the biogas did not burn, fermentation quickly stopped. The optimum flour content in the substrate based on cow manure, in which the biogas yield increases 1.5 times, is 3.7%.
Conclusions. Based on the conducted experimental studies, a model of biogas yield with gradual loading of the substrate was built and the optimal flour content in the substrate was determined, at which the maximum biogas yield is provided.
Keywordsbiogas, biogas plant, cattle manure, methane fermentation, methanetank, substandard flour
1. Polishсhuk, V., Tarasenko, S., Antypov, Je., Kozak, N., Zhyltsov, A., Okushko, O. (2020). Study of Methods of Biodiesel Neutralization with Aqueous Solution of Lymonic Acid. For results 6-th International Conference: Renewable Energy Sources (ICoRES 2019) (June 1214, 2019, Krynica, Poland), E3S Web of Conferences. 154. 02007.
2. Polishсhuk, V., Tarasenko, S., Antypov, Je., Kozak, N., Zhyltsov, A., Bereziuk, A. (2020). Investigation of the Efficiency of Wet Biodiesel Purification. For results 6-th International Conference: Renewable Energy Sources (ICoRES 2019) (June 1214, 2019, Krynica, Poland), E3S Web of Conferences. 154. 02006.
3. Dubrovskis, V., Plume, I., Straume, I. (2018, May). Methane production from bread kursu and potatoes vineta waste and effect of catalyst metaferm. Engineering for Rural Development. For results 17-th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development, ERD (May 23-25, 2018, Jelgava, Latvia). 1828-1832.
4. Dubrovskis, V., Plume, I. (2017, May). Biogas potential from damaged bread. Engineering for Rural Development. For results 16-th International Scientific Conference: Engineering for rural Development, ERD (May 24-26, 2017, Jelgava, Latvia). 437-442.
5. Li, C. R., Mortelmaier, C., Winter, J., Gallert, C. (2015). Co-digestion of wheat and rye bread suspensions with source-sorted municipal biowaste. Waste Management, 40, 63-71.
6. Yoon, Y., Lee, S., Kim, K., Jeon, T., Shin, S. (2018). Study of anaerobic co-digestion on wastewater treatment sludge and food waste leachate using BMP test. Journal of Material Cycles And Waste Management, 20 (1), 283-292.
7. Menardo, S., Balsari, P. (2012). An analysis of the energy potential of anaerobic digestionof agricultural by-products and organic waste. BioEnergy Research, 5 (3), 759-767.
8. Kafle, G.K., Kim, S.H., Sung, K.I. (2013). Ensiling of fish industry waste for biogas production: A lab scale evaluation of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and kinetics. Bioresource Technology, 127, 326-336.
9. Lee, H. J., Lee, S. C., Kim, J. D., Oh, Y. G., Kim, B. K., Kim, C. W., Kim, K. J. (2003). Methane production potential of feed ingredients as measured by in vitro gas test. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 16 (8), 1143-1150.
10. Alagcan, D. G., Pratap, S. K., Alagcan, M. M., Ginasha, D. R., Tuivavalagi, N. S., Garg, S. K. (2012). Use of compact biogas plant for biogas production utilizing Waste foodmaterials, fruits, and vegetable peelings of high calorific contents. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Metallurgy, 2 (1), 371-381.
11. Acharya, R. C., Mukundan, U. (2015). Effect of substrate variation on biomethane production at pilot scale. European Journal of Biotechnology and Bioscience, 3 (4), 24-27.
12. Bee, S. T., Nithiyaa, M., Sin, L. T., Tee, T. T., Rahmat, A. R. (2013). Investigation of biogas production and its residue with fertilization effect from municipal waste. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16, 1104-1112.
13. Murphy, J., Braun, R., Weiland, P., Wellinger, A. (2011). Biogas from Crop Digestion. IEA Bioenergy.
14. Vitanza, R., Cortesi, A., Gallo, V., Colussi, I., De Arana-Sarabia, M. E. (2016). Biovalorization of brewery waste by applying anaerobic digestion. Chemical аnd Biochemical Engineering Quarterly, 30 (3), 351-357.
15. Colussi, I., Cortesi, A., Gallo, V., Vitanza, R. (2016). Biomethanization of brewer's spent grain evaluated by application of the anaerobic digestion model No. 1. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 35 (4), 1055-1060.
16. Bochmann, G., Drosg, B., Fuchsa, W. (2015). Anaerobic digestion of thermal pretreated brewers' spent grains. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 34 (4), 1092-1096.
17. Panjiсko, M., Zupancic, G. D., Zelic, B. (2015). Anaerobic biodegradation of raw and pre-treated brewery spent grain utilizing solid state anaerobic digestion. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 62 (4), 818-827.
18. Panjicko, M., Zupancic, G. D., Fanedl, L., Loga, R. M., Tisma, M., Zelic, B. (2017). Biogas production from brewery spent grain as a mono-substrate in a two-stage process composed of soiid-state anaerobic digestion and granular biomass reactors. Journal Of Cleaner Prodaction, 66, 519-529.
19. Jatunarachchi, T. S. S., Senaratne, A. U., De Alwis, A. (2006). Study of anaerobic digestion of brewery spent grains. International Energy Journal, 7 (4), 279-287.
20. Wei, S., Bai, Z. H., Qin, W., Wu, Z. G., Jiang, R. F., Ma, L. (2018). Nutrient use efficiencies, losses, and abatement strategies for peri-urban dairy production systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 228, 232-238.
21. Hirano, M. Y., Da Silva, C. L. (2018). Dairy cattle biogas usage in microturbines for energy generation and thermal exploitation. Engenharia Agricola, 38 (4), 526-535.
22. Lijo, L., Gonzalez-Garcia, S., Bacenetti, J., Moreira, M. T. (2017). The environmental effect of substituting energy crops for food waste as feedstock for biogasproduction. Energy, 137, 1130-1143.
23. Bilandzija, N., Voca, N., Kricka, T., Jurisic, V., Matin, A. (2013). Biogas production on dairy farms: A Croatia case study. Mljekarstvo, 63 (1), 22-29.
24. Samuna, I., Saeeda, R., Abbasa, M., Rehanb, M., Nizami, A.-S., Asam, Z.-ul-Z. (2017). Assessment of bioenergy production from solid waste. Energy Procedia, 142, 655-660.
25. Ohemeng-Ntiamoah, J., Datta, T. (2018). Evaluating analytical methods for the characterization of lipids, proteins and carbohydrates in organic substrates for anaerobic co-digestion. Bioresource Technology, 247, 697-704.
26. Malakhova, D. V., Egorova, M. A., Prokudina, L. I., Netrusov, A. I., Tsavkelova, E. A. (2015). The biotransformation of brewer's spent grain into biogas by anaerobic microbial communities. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 31 (12), 2015-2023.
27. Oliveira, J. V., Alves, M. M., Costa, J. C. (2018). Biochemical methane potential of brewery by-products. Clean Technologies And Environmentral Polycy, 20 (2), 435-440.
28. Mamchenkov, I. P., Potashov, A. I., Chernavin, A. S. (1964). Fertilizer Handbook. Moscow: Ear.
29. Vasiliev, V. A., Filippova, N. V. (1988). Handbook of Organic Fertilizers. Moscow: Rosagropromizdat.
30. GSTU 46.004-99. (1999). Wheat flour. Specifications Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
31. Gerasimenko, V. G., Gerasimenko, M. O., Melnichenko, O. M. (2004). Biotechnology. Bila Tserkva.
32. Schulz, H., Eder, B. (2006). Biogas practice. Basics, planning, plant construction, examples. Staufen near Freiburg, Germany: Okobuch Verlag.
33. Amon, T., von Bredov, H., Gromke, J. D., Doehler, H., Fisher, E., Frie, J., Woolf, S. (2005). Planning and installing bioenergy systems. A guide for installers, architects and engineers. Gyultsov-Pruzenm Germany: Special Renewable Resources Agency (FNR).
34. Karp, D. B. (2004). Econometrics. Vladivostok: DVGAU.
35. Förster, E., Rönz B. (1979). Methoden der Korrelations und Regressionsanalise. Berlin: Verlag die Wirstschaft.
36. The method of dividing a segment in half. 
​URL: http:// (Last accessed: 15.02.2019).
37. Zablodskiy, M., Savchenko, V., Sinyavsky, O., Pliuhin, V. (2018, April). Interactions Between Magnetic Field and Biological Objects of Plant Origin. Proceedings For results IEEE 38th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology, ELNANO. (April 24-26, 2018, Kyiv, Ukraine).